Second
The Second Open Letter to Princetonians is available on request to devine111@comcast.net
Old-timers' Day
Underhanded Pitch
Forget the endowment,
87% of Princeton's net tuition revenues are paid for by the annual giving
campaign, the reunions-based solicitation of alumni. Additional donations,
those unrelated to annual-giving, are more than sufficient to cover the
remaining 13% (net tuition is approximately $85 million,
annual-giving just hit $74 million, and in 2015-16, a year in which
annual-giving was less than $70 million, revenue from "private gifts,
grants, and contracts" was $93 million). So why do we collect net tuition?
Because if we didn't we would have to find another source for $85 million in
lost revenue, or we would have to cut spending by $85 million. Cutting spending
should be a priority in any event. It currently increases at super-inflationary
rates (8.3% in fiscal 2016). Spending includes, for example, $125 million for
"plasma physics laboratory (PPL)" (a 6% increase over fiscal 2015). PPL
is a completely failed project having nothing whatsoever to do with student
education. Spending also includes $143 million in "interest on
indebtedness." Borrowing by Princeton is, obviously, and completely,
inexplicable with an endowment of $22 billion. These examples are in addition
to super-inflationary increases in every other "educational and
general" expenditure (except "library," of all things). The
primary offenders are "academic departments and programs," 13%
increase, and "academic support," 15% increase. If the fiscal 2016
increase in spending had been held to 2% (more than the increase provided to
social security recipients that year) the lost $85 million in net tuition would
have been covered with money to spare.